Skip to main content
Building a smarter way to manage AI costs.Join Early Access
Product Architecture
System Specification

The Multi-Client AI FinOps Architecture.

How SoftWritely unites developer inference telemetry, client account boundaries, and executive financial governance into one unified platform.

Structural Foundation

The 4-Tier Multi-Client Hierarchy

SoftWritely structures agency operations into four isolated yet interconnected levels. Budgets cascade downward, while token telemetry and financial ledgers rollup upward.

Multi-Client Structural Hierarchy

How SoftWritely organizes agencies, client accounts, isolated projects, and AI providers

Illustrative Preview — Sample Data
Level 2 • Client Accounts (Isolated Cost Boundaries)
Level 3 • Projects & Workloads (Unique Project Identifiers)
Level 4 • Multi-Provider Ingestion & Financial TelemetryOpenAI • Anthropic Claude • Google Gemini • DeepSeek
72.0M Total Tokens Reconciled
Bidirectional Value Flow:

Budgets, rate limits, and threshold alert policies propagate downward from Organization → Client → Project. Conversely, raw token telemetry, latency logs, and inference costs stream upward from provider endpoints, rolling up into accurate client invoices and agency margin ledgers.

1. Organization Boundary

Master agency workspace containing global team credentials, payment currencies, and overarching agency margins.

2. Isolated Client Profiles

Dedicated containers for each enterprise customer (e.g. Client A: FinTech Corp) with distinct monthly budgets and billing cycles.

3. Project-Level Attributions

Granular application tags (chatbots, extraction bots, agents) isolating token consumption and latency metrics per deliverable.

Ingestion Engineering

Dual Integration Philosophies

Every agency infrastructure is different. SoftWritely supports both asynchronous read-only provider usage synchronization and an ultra-low latency real-time proxy gateway.

Dual Integration Architecture

Comparing SoftWritely SDK/Gateway proxying vs. Direct Provider API ingestion

Illustrative Preview — Sample Data
Approach B: Real-Time FinOps SDK & Proxy GatewayReal-Time • Policy Blocking Capable
Step 1 • Client AppAI Agent / Application

Requests pass client & project IDs via SDK headers or proxy URL.

metadata: client-a, proj-101
Step 2 • SoftWritelyFinOps SDK / Proxy

Evaluates active budget caps & logs 11 real-time telemetry fields.

<1ms streaming overhead
Step 3 • AI ProvidersTarget LLM Endpoint

OpenAI, Gemini, Claude, or DeepSeek fulfills inference stream.

Native provider response
Step 4 • AnalyticsFinOps Intelligence

Costs attributed instantly to client invoices, threshold monitors & alerts.

Real-time alert dispatch
Technical Comparison: SDK/Gateway vs. Direct Billing Ingestion
CapabilitySDK & Proxy Gateway (Planned)Direct Provider API Ingestion
Real-time token metricsInstant (per request)Hourly / Daily sync
Granular project taggingFull metadata attributionDependent on provider key isolation
Automated budget policy blocksYes (at 100% threshold)No (alerts only)
Implementation effortChange base URL or SDK importZero code changes (Read-only API key)
Platform Modules

Six Purpose-Built AI FinOps Engines

Explore how each module operates independently or harmonizes to create complete financial visibility.

Multi-Client Account Isolation

Client Management

Isolate AI API expenditures by client account. Configure client profiles, track aggregated monthly expenses, and enforce client-specific budgets.

Deliverable Attribution & Workload Hierarchy

Project Management

Organize multiple AI applications under individual clients. Assign unique project IDs to isolate chatbots, extraction bots, and workflow agents.

Real-Time Telemetry & Dual Ingestion

AI API Usage Tracking

Capture 11 comprehensive telemetry fields per request—including prompt tokens, completion tokens, cached tokens, model names, latency, and costs.

Multi-Dimensional Financial Intelligence

AI Cost Analytics

Analyze multi-dimensional spend across providers, models, clients, and timeframes. Distinguish real-time estimated request costs from reconciled invoice totals.

Hierarchical Safeguards & Thresholds

Budget Management

Set hierarchical monthly budgets across organizations, clients, and projects. Receive 50%, 75%, and 90% pacing warnings with optional 100% gateway policy blocks.

Unit Economics & Contribution Margin

Profitability Analytics

Compare client retainer revenues with direct AI API, cloud hosting, and tooling expenses to calculate true gross contribution margins.

Retainer Profitability

Real-World Agency Unit Economics

SoftWritely automatically maps contracted retainer revenues against direct AI API inference fees, dedicated cloud databases, and proxy bandwidth to reveal true gross contribution margins.

Agency Client Unit Economics

Gross contribution margin calculation for Client B — RetailGenius (Monthly Retainer)

Illustrative Preview — Sample Data
Client Monthly Retainer
$300.00
Contracted gross billing
Direct Delivery Costs
-$80.00
AI APIs + Cloud & Proxy
Remaining Contribution73.3%
$220.00
Gross client margin
Retainer Value Allocation ($300 Total)Contribution: 73.3%
Contribution ($220.00 / 73.3%)
AI APIs ($45.00 / 15.0%)
Hosting & DB ($20.00 / 6.7%)
Other Direct ($15.00 / 5.0%)
Direct Engagement Cost Ledger
1. AI API Inference (Claude 3.5 Sonnet & GPT-4o)$45.00
2. Dedicated Cloud / Vector Database (Pinecone / Supabase)$20.00
3. Direct Tooling, Proxy Bandwidth & Webhooks$15.00
Total Direct Delivery Costs$80.00

Accounting Note: Remaining contribution represents gross client margin after direct AI and cloud infrastructure costs. It does not deduct fixed agency overhead, employee payroll, or general operational expenses.

Shape the Future of AI FinOps With Us

Participate in preliminary testing cohorts, share your multi-client AI billing challenges, and gain early platform access.

Get Early Access